From: Jeff L Jones (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Nov 12 2007 - 13:24:12 MST
On Nov 11, 2007 10:07 PM, Norman Noman <email@example.com> wrote:
> should be able to explain general relativity to an eight year old so
> well that their intuitive understanding of the skewing of reference
> frames is better than stephen hawking's.
I seriously doubt this is possible. Regardless of what input goes
into an 8-year old's senses, and regardless of how patient you are or
how good of an explainer you are, they have a lot of prerequisite
stuff to learn--years of it, in fact--that is going to take time to
sink in. Their own neural firing rates only happen at a certain rate.
If you're a really good explainer, maybe you can speed up someone's
learning curve by a factor of 2 or 3, but not by a factor of 100 which
is more like what it would take to get your average 8 year old (or
even an exceptionally bright 8-year-old) to understand GR better than
an expert who has spent his entire life learning it and working in the
field, before they turned 9. Regarding your qualification "better
*intuitive* understanding" I think you gain intuition for a subject
the best by spending years working on it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:00 MDT