Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times

From: Peter de Blanc (
Date: Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:14:09 MDT

On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 17:44 -0700, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> Sorry, I did not express myself correctly. I mean that a population of
> organisms is intelligent, and evolution is the algorithm. My argument is that
> the intelligence of the population is proportional to its algorithmic
> complexity, the length of the shortest program that could output all of the
> DNA of the population.

So you're saying that noise is smarter than anything?

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:58 MDT