From: Russell Wallace (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Jan 08 2007 - 20:42:32 MST
On 1/9/07, maru dubshinki <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I'm not so sure this is true. Public-key cryptography, for example,
> relies on it being easier to check that two primes multiply to a given
> number than it is to actually obtain the answer by factoring that
> given number. Wouldn't zero-knowledge proofs provide a basis for
> information as currency? It allows people to verify the authenticity
> of information to a desired degree of certainty, but wouldn't let any
> of the information leak (which would 'devalue' the possessor's asset).
Zero-knowledge proofs and similar techniques can verify the truth of things
like logical statements about the properties of certain integers. They can't
verify that a statement about the real world, corresponds to a state of
affairs that actually obtains in the real world.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT