Re: This is the third time this has happened [WAS Re: Manhattan, Apollo and AI to the Singularity]

From: justin corwin (outlawpoet@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 25 2006 - 15:37:16 MDT

• Next message: Russell Wallace: "Re: Apollo Project to get to the Singularity"
• Previous message: Chris Capel: "Re: list sniping opinions"
• In reply to: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: This is the third time this has happened [WAS Re: Manhattan, Apollo and AI to the Singularity]"
• Next in thread: Richard Loosemore: "Re: This is the third time this has happened [WAS Re: Manhattan, Apollo and AI to the Singularity]"
• Reply: Richard Loosemore: "Re: This is the third time this has happened [WAS Re: Manhattan, Apollo and AI to the Singularity]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Justin Corwin's post "Offended respondent" is a fairly good case example.

here: http://sl4.org/archive/0606/15333.html

to which there is no reply, although he did post a reply to an earlier
post of mine later, which is on the same subject.

-- 
Justin Corwin
outlawpoet@hell.com
http://outlawpoet.blogspot.com
http://www.adaptiveai.com

• Next message: Russell Wallace: "Re: Apollo Project to get to the Singularity"
• Previous message: Chris Capel: "Re: list sniping opinions"
• In reply to: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: This is the third time this has happened [WAS Re: Manhattan, Apollo and AI to the Singularity]"
• Next in thread: Richard Loosemore: "Re: This is the third time this has happened [WAS Re: Manhattan, Apollo and AI to the Singularity]"
• Reply: Richard Loosemore: "Re: This is the third time this has happened [WAS Re: Manhattan, Apollo and AI to the Singularity]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT