From: Robin Lee Powell (rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org)
Date: Tue Aug 22 2006 - 11:46:15 MDT
Having nothing to do with the Singularity, seems not so much to me.
-Robin
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 01:33:34PM -0400, Eric Rauch wrote:
> So I guess faster than light travel wouldn't be SL4 either?
>
>
> On 8/22/06, J. Andrew Rogers <andrew@ceruleansystems.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >There is no need to discuss crackpot nuttery on the SL4 list. Dozens
> >of claims of this type are made every year such that you could pretty
> >much make a template of it.
> >
> >If you want to violate the laws of thermodynamics, that is fine.
> >Just not here.
> >
> >
> >J. Andrew Rogers
> >SL4 Auxiliary List Sniper
> >
> >
> >
> >On Aug 22, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Shane Antyr wrote:
> >> In 2003 Steorn undertook a project to develop more efficient micro
> >> generators. Early into this project the company developed certain
> >> generator configurations that appeared to be over 100% efficient.
> >> Further investigation and development has led to the company's current
> >> technology, a technology that produces free energy. The technology is
> >> patent pending.
> >
> >
> >
-- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://intelligence.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT