Re: analytical rigor

From: Michael Vassar (michaelvassar@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 23 2006 - 16:29:31 MDT


Pretty much.

>Okay, Michael, I'll take the bait: what is the message we should derive
>from these parables?
>
>That someone is using intuitions to conclude that certain facets of AGI
>[which ones, exactly?] are impossible, whereas someone else is trying to
>insist that such intuitions [of impossibility] usually turn out to be
>unreliable?
>
>I am not sure which aspect of the debate you mean this to apply to.
>
>Richard Loosemore



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT