From: Daniel Radetsky (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri May 12 2006 - 17:02:11 MDT
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 13:42 +0200, David Picon Alvarez wrote:
> I think Searle might be considered a top thinker by some people, but
> his Chinese room argument seems dishonest.
Please don't bash Searle. The reason is because I disagree with you
(because you are wrong), but I can't argue this point because the thread
will be considered (rightly) either a dead horse or not sl4.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT