Date: Mon May 08 2006 - 06:13:51 MDT
In a message dated 07/05/2006 18:29:37 GMT Daylight Time, firstname.lastname@example.org
> The problem I haven't been able to solve is *rigorously* describing how
> a classical Bayesian expected utility maximizer would make changes to
> its own source code, including the source code that changes the code;
> that is, there would be some set of code that modified itself.
> Classical decision theory barfs on this due to an infinite recursion.
No system can be designed which is able to optimise it's own source code.
I would have thought that Godel's Incompleteness Theorem would have made
that abundantly clear.
The solution is actually rather simple -
You use TWO or more separate systems (with different code structures) to
modify each other.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT