Re: Fun with Experimental Design [WAS: Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy]

From: ARGOSYPC@aol.com
Date: Sat May 06 2006 - 16:53:05 MDT

Next message: Charles D Hixson: "Re: Fun with Experimental Design [WAS: Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy]"
Previous message: Charles D Hixson: "Re: Fun with Experimental Design [WAS: Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy]"
Maybe in reply to: Richard Loosemore: "Fun with Experimental Design [WAS: Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy]"
Next in thread: Charles D Hixson: "Re: Fun with Experimental Design [WAS: Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy]"
Reply: Charles D Hixson: "Re: Fun with Experimental Design [WAS: Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Sorry to be an idiot, but I'm a newbie around here.

why is everyone discussing metaphysics, logic & philosophy, etc ?

I thought Singularity research was about technology development (first),
as it's a step-by-step process.

I go here : _http://www.gizmag.com/home/_ (http://www.gizmag.com/home/)
to check what's happening in Realtime.

Paul C.

Next message: Charles D Hixson: "Re: Fun with Experimental Design [WAS: Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy]"
Previous message: Charles D Hixson: "Re: Fun with Experimental Design [WAS: Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy]"
Maybe in reply to: Richard Loosemore: "Fun with Experimental Design [WAS: Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy]"
Next in thread: Charles D Hixson: "Re: Fun with Experimental Design [WAS: Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy]"
Reply: Charles D Hixson: "Re: Fun with Experimental Design [WAS: Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT