Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow

From: Damien Broderick (thespike@satx.rr.com)
Date: Fri Apr 28 2006 - 14:42:11 MDT

Next message: Woody Long: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
Previous message: Ben Goertzel: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
In reply to: Woody Long: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
Next in thread: Robin Lee Powell: "OT (was Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow)"
Reply: Robin Lee Powell: "OT (was Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 03:18 PM 4/28/2006 -0400, Woody Long wrote:

>Irregardless of whether this is true,

You might want to run this clunker through your syntactical/semantic engine.

Damien Broderick

Next message: Woody Long: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
Previous message: Ben Goertzel: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
In reply to: Woody Long: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
Next in thread: Robin Lee Powell: "OT (was Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow)"
Reply: Robin Lee Powell: "OT (was Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT