Re: The Singularity vs. the Wall

From: Robin Lee Powell (
Date: Sun Apr 23 2006 - 12:19:46 MDT

On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 01:06:34PM -0400, Philip Goetz wrote:
> The classic Singularity, as popularized by Vinge and now Kurzweil
> (I think Ben G. said that Von Neumann used the term in the same
> way?), is that the Singularity is a divide by zero on the
> timeline, the place at which you can't calculate the summed change
> because your calculations go to infinity. This relies on
> exponential curves.

Actually, that's a common misconception: Vinge makes it *very* clear
that his singularity is about the rise of greater than human
intelligence in his original essay. He extrapolates infinite rate
of change from that event, but the core event is about intelligence,
not change.

The more people talk about the singularity as a rate-of-change
event, the more I hate that definition. It's amazingly easy to
argue against, and really not all that useful.


-- ***
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute -

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT