From: Philip Goetz (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Feb 16 2006 - 09:50:05 MST
> In order to argue for exponential advancement of technology -
> let us say, a doubling of output every decade -
> you would have to claim that there was 10 times as much change
> between 1970 and 2006, as between 1934 and 1970,
> and 100 times as much change as between 1888 and 1934.
That should say 1898. Argument is still valid.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:55 MDT