Misunderstanding?

From: Rick Geniale (rickgeniale@pibot.com)
Date: Mon Jan 30 2006 - 05:26:05 MST


Dear Sirs,

In the last couple of days, we have deeply analyzed the scenario in
which we are and from almost every point of view. Also, we have mainly
deeply analyzed the reactions that our written communications could have
produced in the audience.
First of all, let us explain that there is a *very very big
misundertanding*, but this misunderstanding in not attributable to us.
We think that the main reason is the possible impact of our AGI work in
the AGI world.
Let us better explain our viewpoint.
The AGI world is not a world in which there are many financial resources
(you can read Ben Goerztel declarations about that).
For example, if someone ask to us "Why invest in AGI?", our response is:
"because AGI is a very positive invention".
When we said that "anybody today can practically demonstrate to possess
an AGI could worth ...", we don't speak of economic (or financial)
value, but we speak of a scientific value in perspective and for all
people (this is the only meaning, not others).
Therefore, if we meet a potential investor in any place (on the train,
on the beach, on the mountains, or anywhere), we could explain to him
that our AGI is only positive (there is no negative aspects in our AGI).
Furthermore, we could explain to a potential investor that he should not
invest his time with machiavellians people (we are not machiavellians)
that are only negative people (this is an italian "idiom" that
demonstrate only our *high personal esteem* towards any potential investor).
Regarding our strategy, we don't have affirmed in any place that we want
to necessarily build a supercompany (we are always been opened to many
solutions).

We hope that this explanation definitively clarify our intentions once
and for all.
Misunterstanding cannot persists forever.

Best Regards.

Rick Geniale Enterprises Corp.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:55 MDT