From: Robin Lee Powell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jan 26 2006 - 16:11:37 MST
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 02:52:18PM -0800, Eliezer S. Yudkowsky wrote:
> 1: A finite computer has only a finite number of possible states.
> In the long run, then, you *must* either die (not do any
> processing past a finite number of operations), go into an
> infinite loop (also implying no further processing), or grow
> beyond any finite bound. Those are your only three options, no
> matter the physics.
I posit that having your states describe a strange attractor, which
is rather different than an infinite loop but also basically falls
in that category, is another option.
*Great* post, btw. Really good stuff.
-- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://intelligence.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:55 MDT