From: Charles D Hixson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jan 18 2006 - 16:48:47 MST
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 04:44 pm, fudley wrote:
> No hardware component is uniquely required for thought, the key to
> intelligent behavior is how the components (and they can be almost
> anything) are organized.
This seems to me the most reasonable hypothesis at the current state of
knowledge. But it remains a hypothesis. The only way I can see to prove it
is via a constructive proof.
> John K Clark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:55 MDT