From: Damien Broderick (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jan 17 2006 - 19:27:52 MST
At 05:42 PM 1/17/2006 -0800, Phil wrote:
>Woody has not proposed
>any test that can be carried out by a human.
Has in fact proposed (for a profoundly half-arsed value of "proposed") a
test that specifically and by design *can't* be carried out by a human.
Presumably he means (for a deeply half-arsed value of "means") that he has
a machine that can instantiate the process Searle described: a Vast look-up
table and interface able to respond intelligibly in real time to human
attempts at communication--the most debased form of Turing test.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:55 MDT