From: Phillip Huggan (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Jan 02 2006 - 18:54:55 MST
I withdraw my "It takes money to make money" withdrawal. I stumbled onto Randi's link without taking the time to read it before wasting everyone's time with a post.
Really though, I don't expect a detailed explanation, but I'd like to know what is the general mechanism being posited for psi. Is it time-travel to the past or is it information carrying quantum entanglement? Big Einstein or little Einstein?
Damien Broderick <email@example.com> wrote:
>I withdraw my "It takes money to psi make money" qualifier as well. This
>million seems pretty easy to reach, even allowing psi researchers to set
No, sadly. Randi, unlike professional parapsychologists, is not a
scientist, he is a showman. If you think his offer is genuine, you're more
gullible than fudley's caricature of a parapsychologist.
His stock in trade is demonstrating that deluded dowsers are... gee...
deluded. That people who claim to see auras are deluded or fraudulent
(usually the former). Big deal.
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:55 MDT