From: Damien Broderick (thespike@satx.rr.com)
Date: Mon Jan 02 2006 - 12:21:12 MST
At 06:14 PM 1/2/2006 +0000, BillK wrote:
>As Michael Shermer has commented:
>"But wouldn't that mean that this claim is ultimately nonfalsifiable?
>If both positive and negative results are interpreted as supporting a
>theory, how can we test its validity?
Duh, two-tailed tests *at significant deviations*, however severely defined.
Damien Broderick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:55 MDT