From: fudley (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Dec 28 2005 - 08:57:04 MST
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 "Phillip Huggan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> Oops. I meant to use the term telepathic, not the term psychic.
Shit by any other name would stink as bad. Can we use psychic evidence
to support out per theories now?
> If consciousness is strictly emergent from computation and
> not substrate, we should be aware of all sentient
> activities along the surface area of our light-cones,
> not merely our own minds.
Baffle gab, and two dollar phrases like “light cone” doesn’t make it
> If two computers cannot read each others programming,
> why would a person's saved upload be able to interact
> with the original in any way?
I have no idea what if anything you are driving at. If the original were
different the upload would be different, that seems like a pretty
significant interaction to me.
John K Clark
-- http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:54 MDT