From: Phil Goetz (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Aug 31 2005 - 15:22:24 MDT
--- Michael Vassar <email@example.com> wrote:
> Finally, and importantly, such a scenario is simply not
> going to happen, and is therefore not worth planning for.
1. What law of physics did the scenario violate?
2. Who says we're planning? I was asking a question about
Bayesian reasoning. We often study ideas using hypotheticals
situations, without worrying over how probable they are.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:52 MDT