From: Mike Williams (mikew12345@cox.net)
Date: Tue Aug 02 2005 - 06:42:12 MDT
Daniel Radetsky wrote:
difference.
>
> You reason as though you had reason to believe that there was a
> helicopter/exploit, and not just that helicopter/exploits are logically
> possible.
>
How about another example? My dog can look at his chew toy laying on
the bottom of the swimming pool, and can't figure out any way to
retrieve it. He runs around the pool and barks at it. The solution is
right in front of him, but he can't see it.
Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:23:00 MST