Re: Overconfidence and meta-rationality

From: Tennessee Leeuwenburg (tennessee@tennessee.id.au)
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 18:36:33 MST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Daniel Radetsky wrote:

| On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:29:25 -0800 Robin Lee Powell
| <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
|
|> That's nice. Can he argue ethics with you as well?
|
|
| Of course not. There are no moral geniuses, remember?

Well, yes and no. If you read my essay on morality and evolution, I
mentioned that you could assess the practicality of a moral standpoint
without making moral judgement about it. So you can argue ethics from
the basis of practicality. For example "It's more practical to believe
that property ownership is a moral right than not". ;) Morality
evolves just like everything else.

Cheers,
- -T
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCN42hFp/Peux6TnIRAlaaAJ0bg8c6Vnvtj1+4sKlCje2+5O1ipwCgjULj
TKDLOZvCnwCmO8b+/99MSRI=
=ggrH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:50 MDT