From: Phil Goetz (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Feb 07 2005 - 17:19:09 MST
--- David Clark <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maru Dubshinki" <email@example.com>
> > Here hear! An excellent defence of demarchy. But
> what I find to be
> > the nicest thing
> > about the whole conception (besides stopping most
> corrupt political
> > games; and the fact that by sheer chance most
> decisions would probably
> > be made by lower and middle-class people, the ones
> who, y'know, will
> > actually have to live with the choices gov.'t
> makes, and are not able
> > to scoot off to the Bahamas or to gated
> communities) is the procedural
> > elegance of it.
> I can only hope that the *lower and middle-class
> people* look after just
> Maru's money and life and not mine. There is
> something worse than what we
> now have and it can be found in the above paragraph.
> Maru must believe that
> evolution works best if you propagate the next
> generation from the worst,
> rather than the best, current candidates.
Wow, social darwinism lives.
How much money did your parents make, David?
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:50 MDT