From: Maru Dubshinki (marudubshinki@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Feb 04 2005 - 06:02:57 MST
I'd think that good music is a least a little convergent on several
(somewhere under a quadrillion perhaps :)?, whereas there are so many
possible music pieces, most of which are bad, there would be many
types of bad music. And maybe the ideal degradation algorithm would
be the inverse of the enhancement but I doubt it: going uphill is
different from going downhill, same's integration is different from
differentiation. A randomizing algorithm would do fairly well
degrading, but the inverse wouldn't upgrading.
~Maru
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 20:29:51 +1300 (NZDT), Marc Geddes
<marc_geddes@yahoo.co.nz> wrote:
....
> Questions: What would the difference between the
> 'degradation algorithm' and the 'enhancement
> algorithm' be? Would the degradation algorithm simply
> be the opposite of the enhancement algorithm? How
> many different 'types' of musical degradation are
>>
> Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
> http://au.movies.yahoo.com
>
there do you think? (Is there is finite number of
> different possible ways in which you could 'degrade' a
> given piece of music or an infinite number of
> different possible ways)? Now how many different
> 'types' of musical enhancement are there? (Is there a
> finite number of different possible ways in which you
> could 'enhance' a given piece of music or an infinite
> number of different possible ways)?
>
> =====
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:50 MDT