From: J. Andrew Rogers (andrew@ceruleansystems.com)
Date: Thu Feb 17 2005 - 15:58:13 MST
Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>:
> Not that it's at all unreasonable that someone would think of these
> things, but just that it's *so* stereotypical a conversation. :-)
That is a nice anecdote, but what is it doing on the SL4 mailing list?
People saying or thinking crazy things about AI is not SL4 material, nor
is noting an instance of a phenomenon so well-known to this list. When
people search the Internet for SL4 subject matter, the apparent quality
of the list archives *will* reflect on the credibility of the list and
those associated with it. On the Internet, a significant portion of
one's credibility is defined by the signal-to-noise ratio of one's
broadcasts.
j. andrew rogers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:22:53 MST