Re: Ethics

From: Phil Goetz (philgoetz@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Feb 07 2005 - 17:19:09 MST


--- David Clark <clarkd@rccconsulting.com> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maru Dubshinki" <marudubshinki@gmail.com>
>
> > Here hear! An excellent defence of demarchy. But
> what I find to be
> > the nicest thing
> > about the whole conception (besides stopping most
> corrupt political
> > games; and the fact that by sheer chance most
> decisions would probably
> > be made by lower and middle-class people, the ones
> who, y'know, will
> > actually have to live with the choices gov.'t
> makes, and are not able
> > to scoot off to the Bahamas or to gated
> communities) is the procedural
> > elegance of it.
>
> I can only hope that the *lower and middle-class
> people* look after just
> Maru's money and life and not mine. There is
> something worse than what we
> now have and it can be found in the above paragraph.
> Maru must believe that
> evolution works best if you propagate the next
> generation from the worst,
> rather than the best, current candidates.

Wow, social darwinism lives.
How much money did your parents make, David?

- Phil

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:22:53 MST