RE: Neural darwinism (Re: Human intelligence is obviously absurd)

From: Martin Striz (metastriz@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Feb 01 2005 - 17:35:05 MST

Next message: Martin Striz: "Re: Human intelligence is obviously absurd"
Previous message: Jef Allbright: "Re: Ethics (was FAI (aka 'Reality Hacking'))"
In reply to: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Neural darwinism (Re: Human intelligence is obviously absurd)"
Next in thread: Keith Henson: "Re: Neural darwinism (Re: Human intelligence is obviously absurd)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

--- Ben Goertzel <ben@goertzel.org> wrote:

> Clearly others like the theory as well, e.g. see many of the papers that
> cite Edelman's book "Neural Darwinism":
>
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/context/75278/0
>
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/context/283025/0

Edelman has co-published a book with Guilio Tononi, whom I'm familiar with from
his work in the sleep field. As far as I know, they're both top notch
investigators.

Martin

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com

Next message: Martin Striz: "Re: Human intelligence is obviously absurd"
Previous message: Jef Allbright: "Re: Ethics (was FAI (aka 'Reality Hacking'))"
In reply to: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Neural darwinism (Re: Human intelligence is obviously absurd)"
Next in thread: Keith Henson: "Re: Neural darwinism (Re: Human intelligence is obviously absurd)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:22:52 MST