From: Phil Goetz (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Jan 31 2005 - 11:49:07 MST
--- Phil Goetz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> B) See Stephen Gould's book /Full House/. The
> entire book is a debunking of the idea that
> evolution causes systems to become more complex
> over time. Gould claims, with much data to back
> him up, that evolution is a random walk, and that
> there is no tendency for species to increase in
> complexity over time. The distribution of species
> complexity may grow wider over time, but that is
> only because there is a limiting "left-wall"
> minimal level of complexity below which a species
> cannot go. This makes species complexity a
> one-dimensional random walk with a left boundary.
Oops - I forgot that Gould specifically argues
that this argument may not apply to societies,
which may in fact tend to become more complex
over time. Although I don't buy his argument.
The conclusion may be right, but his claim that
the ability to transfer skills from person to
person via language throws all the rules of
random-walk evolution out the door doesn't make
sense to me. Communicating acquired skills just
changes evolution from Darwinian to Lamarckian,
but I don't know that it would change its
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:50 MDT