From: David Clark (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Jan 15 2005 - 13:23:50 MST
----- Original Message -----
From: "maru dubshinki" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: Fuzzy vs Probability
> Possibly for the very sensible reason that the human architecture is the
> only proven success so far.
Does this mean that the people who said the only proven personal
transportation was the horse (just before cars were invented) and therefore
a car must be designed in terms of a horse?
The same argument can be given for the airplane and birds etc.
To look for solutions from biology when the substrate actually creating the
AI is silicon makes as much sense as designing a car to resemble a horse!
Is this the *very sensible reason* why we should include all the human
design mistakes in an AI?
-- David Clark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:50 MDT