From: Marc Geddes (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Dec 11 2004 - 22:46:15 MST
--- Giu1i0 Pri5c0 <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Good ideas Marc. A few months ago I send a note to
> some lists (don't
> remember if I sent it also to sk4) with compatible
> considerations. Now
> I found it in the everything list archives and
> posted to my blog for
> further editing:
> Would love hearing your comments.
Interesting Guilio. Yes I agree that talk of 'Many
Worlds' and different 'time tracks'' is really only a
pictorial device which is a rough approximation. I
also like the 'shadow'analogy.
It's an intriguing idea that the 'source' of the "I"
is an actual conscisousness capable of perceiving all
the alternative branches at once. Personally though,
I doubt it. I have a different theory. I think it is
more likely that conscious experience can only be
associated with perception of individual QM branches.
That is, I hypothesize that the 'source' does not have
sufficient coherence to give rise to consciousness.
"Live Free or Die, Death is not the Worst of Evils."
- Gen. John Stark
"The Universe...or nothing!"
Please visit my web-sites.
Sci-Fi and Fantasy : http://www.prometheuscrack.com
Mathematics, Mind and Matter : http://www.riemannai.org
Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:50 MDT