From: Jeff Medina (analyticphilosophy@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Dec 11 2004 - 15:53:23 MST
Dani,
A photon, not being an observer, has no point of view, and thus the
'problem' of relativistic spacetime corrections for a photon's
reference class is ill-founded and meaningless.
Harvey,
Whoa. I currently find MW the most plausible interpretation of quantum
physics, and I don't subscribe to *ANY* of the drivel you just
attributed to MW theorists. Messianic rapture? Were you mauled by a
gang of MWI-spouting mafia at some point or something? Perhaps you're
not clear on what the MWI is, or the arguments for it?
Pardon my incredulity, but I find your statement offensive; and doubly
so due to your having presented zero justification for your strange
slander.
Both Dani & Harvey,
While it's clear neither of you find MW plausible, neither of you have
forwarded any actual criticisms of MW. "Eh, I don't think we have the
right perspective yet" isn't a rational criticism of a physical
theory.
Call me crazy for suggesting this, but how 'bout we avoid dismissing a
posit of physics found plausible by a number of actual physicists
(something no one speaking herein are, regardless of my and Dani's
univ physics studies) without providing some well thought out reasons,
whattayasay?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:22:50 MST