From: BillK (pharos@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 12 2004 - 09:45:09 MST
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:40:16 -0500, Keith Henson wrote:
>
> >As an aside note, a better algorithm than the typical tit-for-tat has been
> >found a while ago, but you probably know about it already, although IMO the
> >new algorithm is against the spirit of the thing.
>
> That's really interesting. Does anyone have a pointer?
>
Try the big Slashdot discussion last month for starters
<http://slashdot.org/articles/04/10/14/134202.shtml?tid=185>
Best, BillK
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:50 MDT