From: Jef Allbright (jef@jefallbright.net)
Date: Wed Oct 06 2004 - 19:25:35 MDT
Eliezer Yudkowsky wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
>> At http://yudkowsky.net/bookshelf.html#k_rp we have:
>>
>>     Penrose isn't trying to explain quantum physics; he's trying to
>>     persuade you that the human mind isn't Turing-computable.
>>     (Penrose is right about this, although purely by coincidence.)
>>
>> But at http://yudkowsky.net/tmol-faq/miscellaneous.html#turing we
>> have that human thought, at least, *is* turing computable.
>>
>> I'm not certain that this is a contradiciton, but I'd like to see
>> more about Eliezer's views on this point; anybody got a link?
>
>
> I was once a Penrosian noncomputationalist, for much the same reasons 
> then as my friend Mitchell Porter is now:
>
> --- snip ---
>
> Mundane reductionism always, always, ALWAYS wins.  If you think that 
> is too much emphasis, I should put in a few hundred repetitions of 
> "always", one for every historical case in which reductionism won.
>
In the ultimate big picture, reductionism has already "won", in the 
sense that every piece can be rationally accounted for.  And it's a wise 
statement that "mysterious questions don't have mysterious answers".  
However, seekers find that the human experience is necessarily one of 
bounded knowledge and limited computational resources.  We grow and 
break through each self-made shell and each time see a bit further and 
more clearly -- but we can never fully see our own context.  We can 
influence, but we cannot control, a system of which we are a part.  The 
universe will continue to throw us surprises. 
What does this mean in less mystical-sounding terms?  Discover and apply 
the principles that lead to growth in the environment in which we find 
ourselves.  Growth leads to further discovery and increasingly effective 
influence on the direction of progress.  Go for bottom-up growth rather 
than attempting top-down control.
Yes, it's a dangerous game.  That's why it's important not to waste time 
grasping for the hypothetical perfect solution.
- Jef
http://www.jefallbright.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:22:46 MST