From: Eliezer Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Wed Jun 02 2004 - 12:15:01 MDT
Paul Hughes wrote:
> --- Eliezer Yudkowsky <sentience@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
>> In 2003 I tried to be Belldandy, sweetness and light.  It didn't
>> work... Striving toward total rationality and total altruism comes
>> easily to me. Sweetness and light doesn't; I tried and failed. And ya
>> know what?  I'm arrogant.  I'll try not to be an arrogant bastard, but
>> I'm definitely arrogant...  I will try not to be such an ass as 
>> Newton, try hard not to actually *hurt* anyone, but let's face it, I
>> am not one of the modest geniuses.  The best I can do is recognize
>> this and move on... Isn't it enough that we save the world?  Do we
>> have to be frickin' *modest* about it?  Now that just seems 
>> unreasonable.  How are we supposed to stay sane?
> 
> So, are you saying that you are not sane?
Nope, I'm saying that I plan on staying sane.
> You seem to be admitting that you are both rational AND irrational.
> Emotional outbursts, arrogance, self-descriptors of "MAD scientists" all
> indicate some kind of irrationality and insanity,
What?  Why?  I think we are using extremely different definitions of 
rationality.  Rationality means "Bayesian" not "Vulcan".
> while you simultaneously say rationality comes easy to you.
> 
> Could you please explain the discrepancy?
I aspire to experience those emotions that I would feel if I knew the 
correct answers, not to be emotionless.  Oh, plus that standard business 
about a foolish consistency being the hobgoblin.  We humans are much 
happier when we acknowledge our conflicting facets, rather than trying to 
stuff them all into a consistent public image.  Nothing wrong with being a 
mad scientist and rationalist.  I can laugh maniacally all I want, so long 
as I still get the answers right on questions of simple fact.
In fact, I think I'll laugh maniacally right now.  BWAHAHAHAHA!  BWAHAHAHA! 
  I nearly fell into your clever trap, answering in tones of dull 
solemnity, just because you asked a solemn-sounding question!  I think I 
need to be more silly, lest the people around me fall into the trap of 
being solemn as well as serious.
To this task I shall now apply myself.
Weerp!  Wonk!  Warble!
-- Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://intelligence.org/ Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:22:38 MST