RE: blah blah blah

From: Damien Broderick (thespike@satx.rr.com)
Date: Thu May 27 2004 - 00:48:25 MDT

Next message: J. Andrew Rogers: "Re: Volitional Morality and Action Judgement"
Previous message: Eliezer Yudkowsky: "Re: The dangers of genuine ignorance (was: Volitional Morality and Action Judgement)"
In reply to: Marc Geddes: "RE: The dangers of genuine ignorance (was: Volitional Morality and Action Judgement)"
Next in thread: fudley: "RE: The dangers of genuine ignorance (was: Volitional Morality and Action Judgement)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>
>Ooh, ooh, can I have a go at explaining consciousness?
>
>It has to be some deep 'self-referential' property of
>the universe itself I think. So I would lean towards
>panpsychism: there has to be some 'ground state' of
>pure awareness in everything.

This list is really going to the dogs. Sigh.

Hey, Eliezer, how about amazing us and telling us a few new things?

Damien Broderick

Next message: J. Andrew Rogers: "Re: Volitional Morality and Action Judgement"
Previous message: Eliezer Yudkowsky: "Re: The dangers of genuine ignorance (was: Volitional Morality and Action Judgement)"
In reply to: Marc Geddes: "RE: The dangers of genuine ignorance (was: Volitional Morality and Action Judgement)"
Next in thread: fudley: "RE: The dangers of genuine ignorance (was: Volitional Morality and Action Judgement)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:47 MDT