From: Robin Lee Powell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 12:04:32 MDT
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:28:36PM -0400, Tim Duyzer wrote:
> The three laws of robotics are theoretical science first and plot
> elements second. Of course, it will likely be incredibly difficult to
> build such laws into an artificial intelligence, but that doesn't make
> them any less valid.
That's *not* why they are invalid.
*This* is why they are invalid:
> I would be interested in seeing alternatives to Asimov's 'robot
> morality', though. If you know of a different set of effective laws
> that would protect both human and robot interests, I'd like to see
Well, there's http://www.intelligence.org/CFAI/ for one...
-- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:46 MDT