From: Samantha Atkins (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Mar 14 2004 - 19:08:32 MST
That a language can map into XML and is arguably a good language does
not give weight to the reverse proposition that an XML-based
programming language per se will be a huge advance.
On Mar 14, 2004, at 5:40 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> Samantha Atkins wrote:
>> A well-accepted XML-based programming language
>> will be a
>>> increase to the existing infrastructure.
>> No, it will not. It will be an abomination if it every gets off the
> Take a look at Refal, www.refal.org, which is incomparably more elegant
> than LISP, and has a syntax that can naturally map into XML as a
> Refal does not have nice libraries and optimizing compilers etc. like
> LISP, however.
> -- Ben G
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:46 MDT