From: Ben Goertzel (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Jan 11 2004 - 19:58:18 MST
Sure, I do value life in all its forms. I also value nonlife however ... I
value natural forms like the Grand Canyon, the Southern Alps, etc. etc.
There are a host of values one would like to inculcate in addition to
friendliness to past/present/future sentients
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Philip
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: RE: Friendliness and blank-slate goal bootstrap
> I think that "having respect for all the universe's potential", is
> perhaps included in "Friendliness to sentient beings past, present and
> future" ["past" included to cover the possibility of time travel ;-) ]
I like your current version of your goal statement - "Friendliness to
sentient beings past, present and future" most out of your versions so far.
You might want to mention a spacial dimension - eg. "everywhere".
This goal statement still seems to be some distance away from a goal that
would lead to a "respect for life" in general. I understand your special
regard for sentient beings (I share it) but lots of people have respect "for
life in all its forms" so is there a need for a goal statement that directly
addresses the "respect for life" question without having to be derived from
the "Friendliness to sentient beings everywhere, past, present and future"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:45 MDT