From: Eugen Leitl (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Jan 02 2004 - 07:01:12 MST
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:38:54PM +0000, Mitchell Porter wrote:
> If it motivates you... But I don't think it will happen, and
> I also don't think it spells doom. Basically, in my view the
> sequence of developments will be dumb grey goo, AI,
> smart grey goo. Dumb goo just replicates blindly. Smart
Molecular circuitry will come considerably sooner than self-replicating
machine-phase systems; that substrate seems sufficient for a brute-force AI
As AI changes all the rules, I don't think it's valid to postulate any
milestone sequence in good faith.
> goo is like Vinge's Blight. Dumb goo comes before AI
> because it's simpler. AI comes before smart goo because
> AI on a stable platform is easier. Humans have a chance
> against dumb goo; they don't, against sufficiently smart
Ecosystem goes in a couple of days; will human have a chance? I doubt it, but
I also doubt a team of human designers will produce something as fulminant as
You can't sustainably protect an ecosystem without thoroughly salting it with
the countermeasure -- this would be almost as bad as the blight itself.
> goo; but there'll be an opening for Friendly AI in between.
-- Eugen* Leitl leitl
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:43 MDT