From: Dani Eder (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 13:51:17 MDT
> > I wonder why it is that government funding has
> been so much more effective
> > in biomedical areas than in AI.
> Looks pretty obvious to me. Biomedical areas have
> plenty of obvious,
> useful, fruitful angles of approach. Throw money at
> AI and the
> researchers just bounce off the problem.
I would attribute it to the hardware capability
(<1 Gflop until recently) relative to the estimated
required capability (100 Tflops and up). This
bears about the relationship of a medium model
rocket to the Saturn V moon rocket.
Using my own workplace, the Space Station software
test lab, as an example of a government funded
computer lab, we have about $100K of equipment per
person. So a well-funded AI project with half a
dozen people (my guess at how large such a project
would be today) might afford $600K in computers.
This will buy you at present about 2.5 Tflops in
a commodity cluster type setup. So in the next
few years I expect to start seeing some real progress
in AI research because the hardware is starting
to get powerful enough.
in the software development group.
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:42 MDT