From: Michael Roy Ames (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Dec 08 2002 - 14:42:33 MST
My BS detector got loud at: "The first operation only interfaces with
brain function, e.g. control of your right arm.".
Then I went 'tilt' at: "...and 'wet' neurons are gradually removed."
We don't know how to do these things. Sure, we might currently be
able to identify the particular nerve-bundles that operate a person's
right arm and monitor them, but there is a lot more to controlling
your right arm than just the nerve bundles and the signals that get
passed along them. A *lot* more. Creating a right-arm-signaling
model based on this monitoring is, IMO, plausible. But that model
would bear little relationship to the existing wetware functionality,
in its myriad connections to everything else. The brain/mind is not
solely described by its I/O. There is a lot going on in my brain
that never produces more than a raised eye-brow or two.
It's not worth the time to read.
Michael Roy Ames
Ben Goertzel wrote:
> Can anyone with more neuro expertise tell me: Is this guy correct
> regards what is currently technologically plausible?
> -- Ben G
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:41 MDT