RE: Re[4]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]

From: Ben Goertzel (ben@goertzel.org)
Date: Sun Sep 15 2002 - 19:38:12 MDT

Next message: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Strong-willed AIs [was: continuity of self]"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Strong-willed AIs [was: continuity of self]"
In reply to: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[4]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Next in thread: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[6]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Reply: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[6]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> BG> Our emotional preference is for the latter route -- safety thru
> BG> opening things up -- but we've deferred the decision till a later
> BG> moment...
>
> Who's "we"? This list, or Novamente?
>
> --
> Cliff

Novamente. Certainly the members of this list are too broad a team to have
a near-consensus on any issue like this one!!!

ben

Next message: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Strong-willed AIs [was: continuity of self]"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Strong-willed AIs [was: continuity of self]"
In reply to: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[4]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Next in thread: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[6]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Reply: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[6]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:41 MDT