RE: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]

From: mike99 (mike99@lascruces.com)
Date: Sun Sep 15 2002 - 18:38:42 MDT

Next message: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[2]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Strong-willed AIs [was: continuity of self]"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Next in thread: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[2]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Reply: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[2]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Samantha Atkins wrote:
. . . .
> There are certainly many societies in
> near-paradisical conditions that don't seem to be driven so
> deeply by evolution in such directions. I don't think it is
> hardwired that everything should have a price put on it and be
> owned by someone, especially not in the realm of information and
> ideas.

Could you name some of these near-paradisiacal societies? I must have missed
them.

Mike

Next message: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[2]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Strong-willed AIs [was: continuity of self]"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Next in thread: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[2]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Reply: Cliff Stabbert: "Re[2]: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: continuity of self [ was META: Sept. 11 and Singularity]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:41 MDT