From: Aikin, Robert (raikin@velaw.com)
Date: Wed Oct 10 2001 - 07:19:42 MDT
Are you kidding? Who's not paying attention here?
A pyramid? Hebrew lettering? Am I missing something here? The concept
submitted was a symbol for conscious AI (an eye with no style smacking of
religion, e.g. Egyptian Ra) within a unicursal geometric star. Neither is
Jewish. I'm not sure how you managed to find Hebrew lettering in such.
There are no characters whatsoever from any linguistic family. I take it
your parents are (or were) Jewish, and perhaps your upbringing has something
to do with subliminally reading Hebrew characters.
Here is a suggestion: Forget about a mark based upon an object and focus
upon creating a graphic based upon the (English) letters SIAI. Or even
incorporating the first characters of code proposed for Friendly AI as a
symbolic representation.
Robert
-----Original Message-----
From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky [mailto:sentience@pobox.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:28 PM
To: sl4@sysopmind.com
Subject: Re: Singularity graphics
"Aikin, Robert" wrote:
>
> One additional thought: Almost any symbol employed by SIAI *can* be
> interpreted as religious. The concepts already mentioned could easily be
> confused as such, e.g., a tree is a serious symbol for Kabbalists (Jewish
> and Christian mysticism); the seedling can be identified as an acorn,
> especially sacred to Druids; a handshake with that of secret
> societies/fraternities like Freemasonry; an eye for a number of
Illumination
> cults... Personally, I think that any graphic design should be used
without
> a concern for how it might be misinterpreted. AI is a profound
probability
> beyond the superstitions of past ages.
In the words of Mr. Boffo:
http://www.ucomics.com/misterboffo/viewmb.cfm?uc_full_date=20010625
Any symbol can be interpreted as religious. However, using an eye in a
pyramid surrounded by Hebrew lettering as your symbol is just begging for
trouble.
Picking a symbol that has no immediate mystical connotations to the
average browsing rationalist is a different task than picking a symbol
which *cannot* be mystically interpreted. We might put three graphics on
the back of a T-Shirt, but if so, we'd probably put them in a straight
line rather than a triangle.
And SIAI's current decision is that we want to stay out of trouble, and
that this is worth some visual inconvenience if required.
> Any possible SIAI mark could have a
> textual disclaimer or explanation of the symbol for the public.
A symbol that requires explanation to avert a bad reaction is not
acceptable - we'd take something totally abstract first.
-- -- -- -- --
Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://intelligence.org/
Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system. Thank You
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:37 MDT