From: Damien Broderick (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jul 25 2001 - 03:06:51 MDT
At 12:54 AM 7/25/01 -0700, samantha wrote:
>are we sure that "immaterial" means something
That's what it meant in my commentary on Chalmers.
>Is the information qua information
>not immaterial relative to the signal carrying that
No. Information is the modulation of a material substrate (even if
`material' means something in terms of quantum states that's not
immediately intuitive at the mesoscale).
>If it turns out the "myself program" can be easily
>tranferred or stored and replayed or replicated in many
>bodies/forms then I am not sure what mileage some thought to get
>from the "immaterial soul" would remain missing.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:37 MDT