From: Ben Goertzel (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Jul 17 2001 - 19:47:42 MDT
It was true until very recently for all Windows and Linux *and Solaris*
JVM's. Sun claims they'll have a 64 bit JVM coming out sometime, but the
launch date has been frequently postponed.
I haven't tried IBM's new 64 bit JVM, actually, though I have read about it,
Interesting work at IBM on scalable Java is at
All this is quite new, and I don't know how well it works. Experience shows
that marketing literature is a poor guide to actual functionality for such
systems. I do know IBM has invested a lot of time and money in this.
For us, when we decided to re-implement Webmind to change the *architecture*
(while keeping the mathematical and conceptual basis the same), it was a
tough choice whether to stick with Java (in light of all the progress IBM
and others are making, albeit slowly) or to go with C++. But ultimately, we
decided that if we were going to re-code the system for efficiency, we might
as well go all the way.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf
> Of James Rogers
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:52 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Flare
> On 7/17/01 4:42 PM, "Ben Goertzel" <email@example.com> wrote:
> > A JVM, being 32 bit as all current ones are, has only 2GB max memory
> > available to it, no matter how much memory is in the machine itself.
> This might be true if you are using intrinsically 32-bit
> platforms, but the
> JVMs for higher-end platforms and Big Iron can usually can do 64-bit
> addressing internally. While JVMs run in 32-bit mode by default, some of
> the JVMs for 64-bit platforms (e.g. Compaq and IBM) have a switch that
> allows you to fly past the 32-bit memory addressing limit.
> -James Rogers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:36 MDT