From: Ben Houston (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Jun 11 2001 - 20:25:33 MDT
I feat that those not at the top of the reasoning ability hierarchy will
always be easy pons for those that are no matter what controls are in
place. My suggestion is to make sure that you are not too far from the
Somewhat dystopian outlook on things but that's the way it works now and
I don't see it changing in the future.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf
Of Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: Coercive Transhuman Memes and Exponential Cults
Durant Schoon wrote:
> Imagine transhuman Bill becomes vastly more intelligent than person
> much more that Bill can easily influence Alan to do things Alan might
> to do on his own.
> Fortunately, the Sysop is there to protect Alan by advising against
> which might have deleterious outcomes for him.
Actually, the Sysop is there to protect Alan by saying: "You have a
message from Bill which will take over your brain. I advise in the
strongest possible terms that you delete it without looking at it. Do
want to delete it?"
> Now, imagine Charlie. Transhuman Charlie is sufficiently more
> transhuman Bill. Again our favorite Sysop can warn Bill off from doing
> thing he might not want to do, if only he knew all the consequences.
> is a new twist with this case. Transhuman Charlie might convince
> to modify vis own volition so that accepting new memes from Charlie is
> desired. Transhuman Charlie might advertise his suggested memes
cleverly so that
> transhuman Bill bill chooses them with no violation of vis volition.
Actually, transhuman Bill automatically flushes all messages from
in a single thought smoothly integrated with the Sysop API. Charlie
convince Bill to modify vis volition in the first place - at least, not
using invalid arguments. And if the arguments are valid from Bill's
perspective, even with the consequences taken into account, what's the
problem? Charlie has to be smarter than the *Sysop* to *covertly* take
over Bill, at least if Bill has a normal relationship with the Sysop.
> The result? Exponential cults win (in a weird way).
Only for people who like exponential cults...
> These seem to me to be the interesting kinds of problems that arise
> chosen volition as the "be all, end all" metric of the universe (and
> currently subscribe to this view).
Hm, it looks to me like, in a volition-dominated Universe, only people
want to be taken over by exponential cults wind up in them... isn't that
sort of the point?
-- -- -- -- --
Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://intelligence.org/
Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:36 MDT